At first glance it seems relatively easy to decide which teams have he strongest defences in the EPL.Goals allowed per game is almost universally used to demonstrate defensive ability.A goal conceded is to a large extent down to a team's defenders,so it stands to reason that the less you concede,the better you are.To add even more weight and justification to this choice is that,unlike say the NFL each team plays all the others twice,therefore the schedule is almost identical for everyone.
However,this approach has problems.Defences will face every other attack in the league twice over the season,but they are stuck with their own forward and midfielders for each game.And the quality of a team's other outfield players can impact on the amount of defending a team must do and this in turn can be reflected in the amount of goals they concede.
To take an obvious example.Manchester United defenders at Old Trafford are unlikely to find themselves under the same amount of pressure experienced by their visiting counter parts.United's forward and attacking midfielders will likely have possession of the ball for a longtime,during which there will be little or no defending for United to do.In short overall team quality makes defending easier and not all teams can afford or attract the kind of quality throughout the team enjoyed by Manchester United and the other top teams.
We therefore need to use numbers that initially at least incorporate a team dimension before we try to decide how effective certain parts of a team perform their various tasks.
Average goal difference (AGD) per game is such a stat.It's the difference between the average number of goals per game a team scores and the average number of goals they concede and it is very strongly correlated to success indicators such as final league position.Over the 2010/11 season,Man Utd's average goal difference per game was +1.08,compared to -0.71 for relegated West Ham United.
AGD incorporates both average goals scored and allowed,so it is a genuine team statistic.A team can accumulate positive AGD by scoring goals and although their goal difference will always be eroded by conceding goals it is still advantageous to allow as few goals as possible to be scored against your side.
I've taken each EPL team's seasonal AGD and plotted the numbers against the average number of goals per game allowed by those teams since the 1999/2000 season.As you can see from the graphic below AGD is strongly correlated to goals conceded.We would of course expect it to be.
From the graph we can derive an equation that relates the amount of goals allowed by a team for a certain level of average goal difference.This relationship gives us an opportunity to see how much of a team's AGD is derived from it's defensive abilities compared to the typical expectation for the EPL.Teams that are overachieving in relation to the norm can be considered to be performing extremely well,defensively regardless of their overall level of talent.
Showing posts with label defence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label defence. Show all posts
Wednesday, 28 September 2011
Wednesday, 7 September 2011
You'll Never beat Stoke City.
These thoughts were initially intended to for part of the piece on Stoke City's uncommonly excellent hidden stats,but that article grew too large,so it gets a small post of it's own.
The first table charts how efficient the visiting teams are at turning shots on target into goals for every Premiership team over the last 6 seasons.The quality of the strikeforce faced by the home defence is on average going to be of a similar quality for each team.Constant members of the EPL over the time span will have faced virtually identical calibres of attacks,the only attack they won't have faced but others will are obviously their own.Therefore,the conversion rate that the home team sees for it's opponents shots will be largely dependent upon their ability to defend on target shots.
This ability will be down to the goalkeepers,but a significant proportion of the credit should also be given to the overall defensive capability of the team.If an attacker has time and space to shoot his shot will likely be more accurately aimed away from the keeper and more powerful.If he's being quickly shutdown by defenders,then the quality of his on target shot will suffer,making them easier to save.
Once again Man U top the list.Visitors to Old Trafford converted shots at the lowest rate,but the second most difficult ground to convert on target chances into goals was the Britannia Stadium.Stoke concede proportionally more on target shots than United,but accepting that,they are the second most technically gifted side in the Premiership at dealing with each individual shot.This skill can be quantified in terms of extra points per season gained for this talent.If Stoke were an averagely talented shotstopping side they would have been expected to concede about 71 goals from the 355 on target shots they faced at the Brit instead of the 54 goals they did allow.So together their keepers and defensive players "saved" the side 17 extra goals over three seasons.That equates on average to 3 tenths of a goal for every home game,which in turn is worth 0.2 extra league points per home game or almost 4 extra league points over a seasons worth of games.
Your first option to prevent goals is to stop teams having shots on target,but to do this you have to have the league's best,and therefore most expensive players on your side.If like Stoke you are working on a extremely limited budget by comparison with the top sides,you have to deal with the greater number of shots you face as well as you can.And that's clearly what they do.
Goals Scored to Shots On Target Ratio for Visitors to Premiership Grounds over the Last 6 Seasons.
The table for teams when they are away also features Man Utd near the top,so they can be confident choices as the most effective team overall at dealing with shot on target.Stoke pitch in at 4th spot,they're not quite as impressive on their travels,but they still gain about 2 extra league points by virtue of their shot saving abilities compared to an average road side.
Goals Scored to Shots On Target Ratio for Home Teams Entertaining Specific Sides over the Last 6 Seasons.
The first table charts how efficient the visiting teams are at turning shots on target into goals for every Premiership team over the last 6 seasons.The quality of the strikeforce faced by the home defence is on average going to be of a similar quality for each team.Constant members of the EPL over the time span will have faced virtually identical calibres of attacks,the only attack they won't have faced but others will are obviously their own.Therefore,the conversion rate that the home team sees for it's opponents shots will be largely dependent upon their ability to defend on target shots.
This ability will be down to the goalkeepers,but a significant proportion of the credit should also be given to the overall defensive capability of the team.If an attacker has time and space to shoot his shot will likely be more accurately aimed away from the keeper and more powerful.If he's being quickly shutdown by defenders,then the quality of his on target shot will suffer,making them easier to save.
Once again Man U top the list.Visitors to Old Trafford converted shots at the lowest rate,but the second most difficult ground to convert on target chances into goals was the Britannia Stadium.Stoke concede proportionally more on target shots than United,but accepting that,they are the second most technically gifted side in the Premiership at dealing with each individual shot.This skill can be quantified in terms of extra points per season gained for this talent.If Stoke were an averagely talented shotstopping side they would have been expected to concede about 71 goals from the 355 on target shots they faced at the Brit instead of the 54 goals they did allow.So together their keepers and defensive players "saved" the side 17 extra goals over three seasons.That equates on average to 3 tenths of a goal for every home game,which in turn is worth 0.2 extra league points per home game or almost 4 extra league points over a seasons worth of games.
Your first option to prevent goals is to stop teams having shots on target,but to do this you have to have the league's best,and therefore most expensive players on your side.If like Stoke you are working on a extremely limited budget by comparison with the top sides,you have to deal with the greater number of shots you face as well as you can.And that's clearly what they do.
Goals Scored to Shots On Target Ratio for Visitors to Premiership Grounds over the Last 6 Seasons.
| Home Side. | Shots on Target by Away Side. | Goals Scored by Away Side. | Conversion Rate. |
| MAN UTD. | 508 | 64 | 0.126 |
| STOKE. | 355 | 54 | 0.152 |
| ASTON VILLA. | 672 | 113 | 0.168 |
| BIRMINGHAM. | 453 | 78 | 0.172 |
| CHARLTON. | 238 | 41 | 0.172 |
| CHELSEA. | 417 | 73 | 0.175 |
| TOTTENHAM. | 621 | 113 | 0.182 |
| BLACKBURN. | 657 | 120 | 0.183 |
| BOLTON. | 706 | 130 | 0.184 |
| MAN CITY. | 573 | 106 | 0.185 |
| LIVERPOOL. | 383 | 71 | 0.185 |
| READING. | 238 | 45 | 0.189 |
| EVERTON. | 639 | 121 | 0.189 |
| ARSENAL. | 444 | 88 | 0.198 |
| WOLVES | 251 | 50 | 0.199 |
| FULHAM. | 614 | 124 | 0.202 |
| WEST HAM. | 769 | 157 | 0.204 |
| NEWCASTLE. | 565 | 117 | 0.207 |
| BURNLEY. | 142 | 30 | 0.211 |
| PORTSMOUTH. | 523 | 114 | 0.218 |
| MIDDLESBRO' | 441 | 97 | 0.220 |
| SUNDERLAND | 588 | 130 | 0.221 |
| WATFORD. | 106 | 25 | 0.236 |
| BLACKPOOL. | 152 | 37 | 0.243 |
| HULL. | 256 | 65 | 0.254 |
| WIGAN. | 589 | 150 | 0.255 |
| WEST BROM. | 346 | 89 | 0.257 |
| SHEFFIELD UTD. | 80 | 21 | 0.263 |
| DERBY. | 139 | 43 | 0.309 |
The table for teams when they are away also features Man Utd near the top,so they can be confident choices as the most effective team overall at dealing with shot on target.Stoke pitch in at 4th spot,they're not quite as impressive on their travels,but they still gain about 2 extra league points by virtue of their shot saving abilities compared to an average road side.
Goals Scored to Shots On Target Ratio for Home Teams Entertaining Specific Sides over the Last 6 Seasons.
| Away Side. | Shots on Target by Home Side. | Goals Scored by Home side. | Conversion Rate. |
| CHELSEA. | 583 | 89 | 0.153 |
| MAN UTD. | 659 | 109 | 0.165 |
| EVERTON. | 768 | 129 | 0.168 |
| STOKE . | 509 | 98 | 0.193 |
| BLACKPOOL. | 201 | 41 | 0.204 |
| ASTON VILLA. | 884 | 181 | 0.205 |
| MIDDLESBRO' | 586 | 120 | 0.205 |
| WEST HAM | 912 | 188 | 0.206 |
| LIVERPOOL. | 552 | 116 | 0.210 |
| HULL. | 351 | 74 | 0.211 |
| FULHAM. | 842 | 179 | 0.213 |
| BIRMINGHAM. | 649 | 139 | 0.214 |
| NEWCASTLE. | 714 | 153 | 0.214 |
| TOTTENHMAM | 800 | 172 | 0.215 |
| MAN CITY | 780 | 169 | 0.217 |
| ARSENAL | 607 | 132 | 0.217 |
| PORTSMOUTH. | 703 | 153 | 0.218 |
| WOLVES. | 324 | 71 | 0.219 |
| READING. | 309 | 68 | 0.220 |
| SUNDERLAND. | 745 | 166 | 0.223 |
| WEST BROM. | 493 | 111 | 0.225 |
| BOLTON. | 869 | 196 | 0.226 |
| WATFORD. | 148 | 34 | 0.230 |
| BLACKBURN. | 866 | 203 | 0.234 |
| SHEFFIELD UTD. | 138 | 34 | 0.246 |
| WIGAN. | 801 | 198 | 0.247 |
| CHARLTON. | 296 | 74 | 0.250 |
| DERBY. | 170 | 46 | 0.271 |
| BURNLEY. | 179 | 52 | 0.291 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
